Any accident victim has a duty to minimize the effects of his or her injury. By the same token, each of them is supposed to exercise due diligence and use reasonable judgment.
Each victim should follow the doctor’s instructions.
Victims that fail to do what the treating doctor has suggested should accept the fact that their chances for a full compensation have been reduced. There is a situation where the court might overlook a victim’s failure to follow the suggestion that came from the treating physician. That situation would be one where the doctor’s suggested treatment could not qualify for inclusion on a listing of routine treatments.
Another way by which accident victims can work to minimize the effects of their injuries
Any accident victim should arrange to receive prompt medical attention. Such attention could come from medical personnel in a hospital, at a clinic, or at a doctor’s office. Victims that have gone to a hospital or clinic ought to schedule another appointment with their general physician. That action would ensure the documentation of their exposure to the forces that are associated with a collision, as per a Personal Injury Lawyer in St John’s.
Some injuries have slow-to-appear symptoms. If a doctor had not been informed about a patient’s previous involvement in a car crash, then he or she might not realize the reason for the symptoms that have seemed to appear out of “nowhere.”
Ideally, that piece of advice should sink into the mind of any parent. If any child or teen were involved in a car accident, then he or she should be seen by the family doctor, or by the pediatrician. Otherwise, neither of those medical professionals would be able to account for the unanticipated emergence of some late-appearing symptom.
Obligation of someone that was disabled, following an accident
That disabled victim should receive 2 years of coverage from any company that had sold him or her disability insurance. At the end of those 2 years, the same company could ask the policyholder to receive training in a skill that would match with his or her reduced capabilities.
A company that sells disability insurance has the right to issue that request to those policyholders that have received 2 years of coverage. Not every disabling injury makes the victim unable to perform any sort of job function. Hence, those offering coverage have the right to ask the policyholder to undertake a retraining program, or to complete a re-education effort.
So, what could happen to a policyholder that has chosen to forego any of the suggested re-training or re-education? He or she might continue to get some coverage from the insurance company, but it could be doled to them out at a markedly reduced level.