Someone’s negligence causes most car crashes. In other words, 2 vehicles are most apt to collide when one or both drivers commit an unintentional violation of written or assumed law. How does the legal system identify the person that has been careless and neglectful?
Legal authorities devote time to examining the evidence.
• They look for any evidence at the scene of the accident. Can skid marks be found on the pavement? Can tire marks be found in the dirt? Have paint marks been located on any surface?
• The location of an impact on the damaged vehicles offers an indication of what took place.
• Witness statements get reviewed.
• Photographs get studied. A search for video footage gets made.
• Significant facts can be found in the police report.
• Insurance claims and hospital documents confirm or deny the statements from the involved parties.
Was the plaintiff negligent? If so, how did the plaintiff’s negligence compare to that of the defendant?
Those are questions that need to be answered, in order to determine who is at fault. Sometimes the plaintiff/victim has contributed to the accident in some way. The most common behavior that triggers a charge of contributory negligence consists of failure to wear a seat belt.
Still, Personal Injury Lawyer in Moncton should now work on learning more about the material posted online by the sellers of car escape tools. Those are items that can help the victim of a car accident to escape from a damaged vehicle.
How does that online material relate to unintentional violations?
The victim of an automobile accident might have unintentionally violated an unwritten code of safety by not purchasing a car escape tool. According to information posted online, that particular tool gives the driver an added element of safety, if he or she must driver through a dangerous region.
What are some examples of a dangerous region? Those would be routes along a road or highway that passed over a bridge, forced a driver to travel close to deep water, followed a path close to a cliff’s edge, passed under falling rocks, or crossed an uninhabited region. Those are places where the presence of an escape tool might prove useful.Such a tool could be used to cut open a seat belt, if you were trapped in car, one that was sinking in a pool of water. Some tools have an attached emergency light or a device that can be used for placing a phone call.
Possession of such a tool reduces the chances for a severe injury, if a driver enters a dangerous region. For that reason, the tool’s absence might be viewed by lawyers defending a responsible driver as proof that a victim aggravated the acquired injuries.