If a car crash has caused a large amount of damage on the involved vehicles, that fact makes a huge contribution to the available evidence. Still, it is only one of the many items that can be used to determine who caused that terrible collision.
Other possible evidence
The scene of the crash needs to be searched. It could hold a piece of evidence, such as a distinct tire track. If paint from one vehicle can be found on one of the other vehicles, that fact should be noted and taken into consideration. The location of the reported damage can verify or refute the statement made by a claimant, as well as the claims made by the opposite party.
The value of witness testimony would depend on the witness’ location at the time of the accident. The words that come from a bystander would hold more weight than those that might come from an injured passenger. Still, both statements would contribute to a final determination of who was at fault.
Photographs and video footage serve as highly useful evidentiary material. If one of the involved vehicles had a dash cam, then that could become a source of footage that should help with gaining a greater insight into what took place when the vehicles collided.
The police report serves as a way to fill in the details, which might be missing from the other collected and reported items. An examination of the traffic laws sheds light on what possible violation of the law might have aided creation of an accident-prone situation. The insurance company makes an estimate for the costs of the damage. That figure gets added to all of the other evidentiary material.
The insurance company’s estimate has been based on a look at the property damage. The bills from the hospital and doctors’ offices, the places where the victims were examined and treated, provide those that are trying to settle the dispute with more facts to consider.
Evidentiary material that might get added, if the dispute needed to move on to the litigation stage.
At a trial, the Personal Injury Lawyer in Moncton for either side might present a computer-aided reconstruction of the accident. It provides the jury with a level of insight that cannot be gained by looking at a simple drawing.
There may be other documents that could help a jury to determine who should be blamed for the collision that produced all the damage and injuries. There may also be other video footage, perhaps some taken from a video camera that had been installed by a local business, such as a store, a restaurant or a parking lot. It is always possible that another eyewitness might have been located.