Personal injury lawyers offer 2 benefits to any prospective client. Each of those members of the legal profession expects to be paid a contingency fee. That means any client pays only an agreed-upon percent of the client’s award, if he or she wins the case.
The second benefit relates to the first consultation. There is no charge for that first consultation. Still, some clients have this question: What should I do after consulting with a personal injury attorney?
Recommended actions for someone that has consulted a Personal Injury Lawyer in Moncton:
Every 3 to 6 months, share with that same lawyer any information obtained during a scheduled visit to a treatment physician. At the same time, plan on sharing any facts that concern a result from a test or an observation made from an image, such as an X-ray.
Keep lawyer’s office posted of any changes to your condition. That change might reflect the appearance of a new symptom, a discovery of a finding that alters the doctor’s diagnosis, or the need to schedule a trip to the office of a medical specialist.
Things to keep in mind during a scheduled meeting with a hired personal injury lawyer:
• Any new documents that have come into your possession. Those should be documents that relate in some way to your claim against the responsible party.
• Receipts that you have collected while taking care of various medical expenses;
• Dates of past and future appointments.
• Dates for the periods when you could not report to work.
• Any correspondence that you have received from the insurance company.
• The information in a journal or diary, which has been used to keep track of the times when you experienced a painful sensation. Explain what action you were unable to carry out, because you were in so much pain.
Concerns that might be raised, following that initial consultation:
• Will earlier injuries have an impact on this case? Will my pre-existing condition affect my chances for obtaining a fair settlement?
• Can I be penalized for going through with an extensive and expensive diagnostic procedure, in order to determine the precise nature of my problem?
• What financial resources can I expect to be made available to me, if I am forced to deal with a long recovery?
• The other party insists that I am partly responsible for the accident; do you know how to present a strong challenge to that argument?